Mitchell Marsh avoids clear LBW call, Virat Kohli’s reaction sparks outrage among fans
[ad_1]
Umpiring controversies mar the Border-Gavaskar Trophy as KL Rahul and Mitchell Marsh fall victim to questionable calls, with Australia leading in the second Test after dismissing India for 180.
New Delhi: The umpiring in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy has been under scrutiny as KL Rahul was given out caught behind in the first innings of the Perth Test, where the evidence was inconclusive and the on-field umpire had given him not out.
India suffered another controversial decision when Mitchell Marsh was adjudged not out by the third umpire, despite replays suggesting he was trapped LBW by Ashwin. The on-field umpire’s not-out call was upheld due to “inconclusive evidence” on whether the ball hit the pad first, though front-on replays clearly showed otherwise. Ball-tracking confirmed it was hitting the stumps, denying India a crucial wicket.
Ravi Ashwin to Mitchell Marsh..
– Ball hits clearly on pad first but 3rd Umpire says there is not conclusive evidence to overturn on field umpire decision..!!😡
— MANU. (@Manojy9812) December 7, 2024
There was clear a clear gap . Third umpire always gives decisions against INDIA. Cheater always a cheater #INDvsAUS pic.twitter.com/8vSj0t3Soy
— Gurjit (@gurjit_sinqh) December 7, 2024
So they found conclusive evidence to turn around KL. Rahul’s decision, but nothing in the case of Mitchell Marsh (These Aussie Cheaters )
Ennna elavu da idu ??? #AUSvIND pic.twitter.com/BC4hU9fx8f— Voice_of_cricket_official (@voiceofcricke) December 7, 2024
This is pathetic by Richard Kettleborough. He was unsure of bat first or pad first but gave not out based on Snicko. Mitchell Marsh was safe as impact was umpires call but India would have kept the crucial review. #INDvAUS #INDvsAUS #indvsausTestseriespic.twitter.com/CZU8dpWSXy
— Ganesh (@me_ganesh14) December 7, 2024
Australia is in a commanding position in the second Test, having bowled India out for just 180. With six wickets in hand and a substantial lead already, a lead of 100 or more could prove decisive.
[ad_2]
Source link
